Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-31-2023

Publication Source

Geocarto International

Abstract

In this paper, we examined the degree to which inherent spatial structure in soil properties influences the outcomes of machine learning (ML) approaches to predicting soil spatial variability. We compared the performances of four ML algorithms (support vector machine, artificial neural network, random forest, and random forest for spatial data) against two non-ML algorithms (ordinary least squares regression and spatial filtering regression). None of the ML algorithms produced residuals that had lower mean values or were less autocorrelated over space compared with the non-ML approaches. We recommend the use of random forest when a soil variable of interest is weakly autocorrelated (Moran's I < 0.1) and spatial filtering regression when it is relatively strongly autocorrelated (Moran's I > 0.4). Overall, this work opens the door to a more consistent selection of model algorithms through the establishment of threshold criteria for spatial autocorrelation of input variables.

ISBN/ISSN

1010-6049

Document Version

Published Version

Comments

This open-access article is provided for download in compliance with the publisher’s policy on self-archiving. To view the version of record, use the DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2245381

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Volume

38

Peer Reviewed

yes

Issue

1


Share

COinS