Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2016
Publication Source
Howard Journal of Communications
Abstract
This study experimentally tested whether participants held and/or applied stereotypes of baseball players. Participants were asked to rate white, black, and Latino baseball players based on stereotypes consistently identified in previous literature.
Participants saw a photo of a player and an anonymous paragraph from a newspaper that highlighted a particular stereotype. They were then asked to rate the author's credibility. Black players were rated as higher in physical strength and natural ability, consistent with previous literature concerning how athletes were described. However, white and Latin players were not stereotyped. But participants rated white-consistent descriptions as credible and Latin-consistent descriptions as less credible. These results are interpreted through the prism of social identity theory.
Inclusive pages
68-84
ISBN/ISSN
1064-6175
Document Version
Postprint
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, Taylor & Francis
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Volume
27
Peer Reviewed
yes
Issue
1
eCommons Citation
Ferrucci, Patrick; Tandoc, Edson C. Jr.; Painter, Chad; and Wolfgang, J. David, "Foul Ball: Audience-Held Stereotypes of Baseball Players" (2016). Communication Faculty Publications. 31.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/cmm_fac_pub/31
Included in
African American Studies Commons, Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Latina/o Studies Commons, Social Influence and Political Communication Commons, Sports Studies Commons
Comments
The document available for download is the authors' accepted manuscript, provided in compliance with the publisher's policy on self-archiving. Differences may exist between this document and the published version, which is available using the DOI provided. Permission documentation is on file.