Event Title

Comparison of Biometric Authentication Software Techniques: GEFE vs. Angle Based Metrics

Location

Science Center Auditorium, University of Dayton

Start Date

23-4-2016 11:25 AM

Description

In this paper, we explore three alternatives for developing a biometric authentication software system. The first approach we will consider is a computer vision technique optimized by Genetic and Evolutionary Feature Extraction (GEFE); the second is Angle Based Metrics (ABM); and the third is Angle Based Metrics combined with Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (ABM + GEC). Each of these techniques are research areas which show promise in regards to being able to authenticate users based on their natural mouse movements. When applied to the same data set, the results of our experimentation indicate that both the ABM and ABM + GEC techniques are more accurate than GEFE in correctly verifying genuine users, as well as correctly rejecting impostors.

Comments

Copyright © 2016 by the authors. This paper was presented at the 2016 Modern Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference, held at the University of Dayton April 22-23, 2016.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 23rd, 11:25 AM

Comparison of Biometric Authentication Software Techniques: GEFE vs. Angle Based Metrics

Science Center Auditorium, University of Dayton

In this paper, we explore three alternatives for developing a biometric authentication software system. The first approach we will consider is a computer vision technique optimized by Genetic and Evolutionary Feature Extraction (GEFE); the second is Angle Based Metrics (ABM); and the third is Angle Based Metrics combined with Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (ABM + GEC). Each of these techniques are research areas which show promise in regards to being able to authenticate users based on their natural mouse movements. When applied to the same data set, the results of our experimentation indicate that both the ABM and ABM + GEC techniques are more accurate than GEFE in correctly verifying genuine users, as well as correctly rejecting impostors.