Knowing the factors used in the annual performance evaluation of superintendents is foundational to building a more effective process. The accompanying graph, based on AAS~s decennial survey of the field, shows how superintendents rank seven response options about the conduct of their own assessments by school boards. Critics claim current evaluation practices are plagued by ambiguous purposes, unrealistic expectations, uneven and subjective processes, and invalid outcomes. The overall quality of superintendent evaluations suffers from the variation in the bases of assessments and the number and competence of the evaluators. The limited application of national standards (such as those published by AASA in 1993) and state superintendent association guidelines is especially disturbing because such documents should include essential and validated job requirements. Greater uniformity in evaluation criteria, within and across states, would be a step toward ensuring more purposeful and objective outcomes.
AASA: The School Superintendents Association
Kowalski, Theodore J., "Job Evaluation" (2013). Educational Leadership Faculty Publications. 32.
Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Educational Leadership Commons, Education Economics Commons, Elementary and Middle and Secondary Education Administration Commons, Higher Education Administration Commons, Other Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, Special Education Administration Commons, Urban Education Commons