•  
  •  
 

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Recently, Roger Blough, former Chairman of the Board of the United States Steel Corporation and now a practicing attorney with a large New York law firm, listed ten guiding principles for vitalizing the role of the corporate director.1 The profile of what he termed the "working director" included admonitions to avoid conflicting interests and to keep fully informed of corporate affairs.2 Many corporate counsel have also compiled guidelines for their firms' directors, usually expressed pointedly in terms of "do's" and "don'ts" specifically aimed at avoiding personal liability in the performance of their duties as directors. The impetus for these guidelines, of course, is the increase of litigation in which directors and officers are individually named as defendants in actions based on the federal securities laws. It is axiomatic that the legal climate for business executives has changed radically in recent years. Personal liability is no longer well buffered by the relative explicitness of common law fraud, the shield of the business judgment rule, or the generally short reach of state laws. Standards defined in terms of negligence, due diligence, reasonable investigation, and a sometimes rather liberal interpretation of scienter have greatly increased directors' and officers' vulnerability.

Publication Date

May 1976

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.