Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2016
Publication Source
Journal of Applied Psychology
Abstract
Drawing from an approach-avoidance perspective, we examine the relationships between subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision, fear, defensive silence, and ultimately abusive supervision at a later time point. We also account for the effects of subordinates’ assertiveness and individual perceptions of a climate of fear on these predicted mediated relationships. We test this moderated mediation model with data from three studies involving different sources collected across various measurement periods. Results corroborated our predictions by showing (a) a significant association between abusive supervision and subordinates’ fear, (b) second-stage moderation effects of subordinates’ assertiveness and their individual perceptions of a climate of fear in the abusive supervision–fear– defensive silence relationship (with lower assertiveness and higher levels of climate-of-fear perceptions exacerbating the detrimental effects of fear resulting from abusive supervision), and (c) first-stage moderation effects of subordinates’ assertiveness and climate-of-fear perceptions in a model linking fear to defensive silence and abusive supervision at a later time. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Inclusive pages
731-742
ISBN/ISSN
0021-9010
Document Version
Postprint
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, American Psychological Association
Publisher
American Psychological Association
Volume
101
Issue
5
Peer Reviewed
yes
Keywords
abusive supervision, assertiveness, defensive silence, fear, workplace victimization
eCommons Citation
Kiewitz, Christian; Restubog, Simon Lloyd D.; Shoss, Mindy K.; Garcia, Patrick Raymund James M.; and Tang, Robert L., "Suffering in Silence: Investigating the Role of Fear in the Relationship Between Abusive Supervision and Defensive Silence" (2016). Management and Marketing Faculty Publications. 69.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/mgt_fac_pub/69
Included in
Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons
Comments
The document available for download is the authors' accepted manuscript, provided in compliance with the publisher's policy on self-archiving. Permission documentation is on file. Note: This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The version of record is available using the DOI provided: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000074