Materiality Judgments and the Resolution of Detected Misstatements: The Role of Managers, Auditors, and Audit Committees

Author(s)

Marsha B. Keune, University of DaytonFollow
Karla M. Johnstone, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-2012

Publication Source

The Accounting Review

Abstract

This study investigates how manager and auditor incentives, along with audit committee characteristics, are associated with materiality judgments about detected misstatements. Using data on detected misstatements that occurred between 2003 and 2006, we find auditors' incentives to protect their reputations weaken the effect of managerial incentives associated with the pressure created by analyst following; auditors are less likely to allow managers to waive material misstatements as audit fees increase. Regarding audit committee characteristics, results reveal that audit committees with greater financial expertise are less likely to allow managers to waive material misstatements compared to audit committees with less expertise.

Inclusive pages

1641-1677

ISBN/ISSN

0001-4826

Comments

Permission documentation on file.

Copyright

Copyright © 2012, American Accounting Association

Publisher

American Accounting Association

Volume

87

Issue

5

Peer Reviewed

yes

eCommons Citation

Keune, Marsha B. and Johnstone, Karla M., "Materiality Judgments and the Resolution of Detected Misstatements: The Role of Managers, Auditors, and Audit Committees" (2012). Accounting Faculty Publications. 69.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/acc_fac_pub/69