Multicenter Evaluation of Xpert Carba-R Assay for Detection and Identification of the Carbapenemase Genes in Rectal Swabs and Clinical Isolates

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

10-14-2020

Publication Source

The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

Abstract

Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing organisms is clinically desirable for hospital infection control and antibiotic stewardship. In this multicenter study, the Xpert Carba-R assay was evaluated for detection of the five carbapenemase genes (blaKPC, blaNDM, blaIMP, blaOXA-48, and blaVIM) in 2404 nonduplicate rectal swabs of admitted inpatients and 521 Gram-negative isolates from four tertiary hospitals in China, compared with the reference growth-based method with DNA sequence analysis of colonies. All suspected false-positive results in rectal swabs were resolved by supplementary sequencing from broth cultures. A total of 197 blaKPC, 171 blaNDM, 142 blaIMP, 6 blaVIM, and 5 blaOXA-48 genes were detected by Xpert Carba-R in 417 rectal swabs, with overall positive and negative percentage agreements ranging from 94.5% to 100% and from 94.8% to 99.9%, respectively. Notably, 17.5% (263/1500) of inpatients had rectal colonization with carbapenem-nonsusceptible organisms detected in intensive care units, and 63.1% (166/263) were Xpert Carba-R positive. Among the 469 carbapenem-nonsusceptible and 52 carbapenem-susceptible isolates examined, 373 were Enterobacteriaceae, 55 were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 93 were Acinetobacter baumannii. Compared with the reference isolate sequencing, overall positive and negative percentage agreements were 99.7% and 98.0%, respectively. The intra-assay and interassay coefficient of variability values were both

Inclusive pages

111-119

ISBN/ISSN

Print ISSN: 1525-1578; Online ISSN: 1943-7811

Document Version

Postprint

Comments

The accepted manuscript of this publication will be made available in compliance with the publisher’s policy on self-archiving. Permission documentation is on file. Until then, link to the published version using the DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.10.017

Publisher

Elsevier

Volume

23

Peer Reviewed

yes

Issue

1


Share

COinS