Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2006

Publication Source

Military Medicine

Abstract

Recent research has empirically documented a consistent penalty against heavier service members for events identical or similar to those in the physical fitness tests of the Army, Air Force, and Navy. These penalties, not related to body fatness, are based on biological scaling models and have a physiologic basis. Using hypothetical cases, we quantified the penalties for males, 60 vs. 90 kg body weight, and females, 45 vs. 75 kg, to be 15-20% for the fitness tests of these three services. Such penalties alone can adversely impact awards and promotions for heavier service members. To deal equitably with these penalties in a practical manner, we offer two recommendations:

  1. Implementation of revised fitness tests with balanced events: penalties of one event against heavier service members are balanced by an equal and opposite bias against lighter service members.
  2. Development of correction factors which can be multiplied by raw scores to yield adjusted scores free of body weight bias.

Inclusive pages

753-756

ISBN/ISSN

0026-4075

Document Version

Postprint

Comments

This is the authors' accepted manuscript of a paper that ran in the above-mentioned journal. The version of record may contain minor differences that have come about in the copy editing and layout processes.

Publisher

AMSUS: Society of the Federal Health Professionals

Volume

171

Issue

8

Peer Reviewed

yes

Keywords

allometry, fitness testing, body weight bias

Download
Link to published version

Share

COinS