Document Type
Article
Publication Date
Fall 1986
Publication Source
Marquette Law Review
Abstract
This article addresses how to identify the benefits and costs of revitalization. It further discusses how to allocate the costs efficiently so that revitalizers will internalize expenses, thus enabling them to make efficient decisions about undertaking projects. Efficiency may not be society's ultimate goal, but efficiency in urban revitalization would promote society's goal to treat its members equitably."
This article first examines the costs and benefits of revitalization and outlines who bears the costs and who gains the benefits. This article then offers specific proposals for forcing revitalizers to internalize their costs. These proposals provide some definite conclusions about how cities can encourage efficient revitalization and thereby treat their citizens in an equitable manner.
Inclusive pages
1-40
ISBN/ISSN
0025-3987
Document Version
Published Version
Copyright
Copyright © 1986, James Durham
Publisher
Marquette Law Review
Volume
70
Issue
1
Place of Publication
Milwaukee, WI
eCommons Citation
Durham, James Goeffrey and Sheldon, Dean E. III, "Mitigating the Effects of Private Revitalization on Housing for the Poor" (1986). School of Law Faculty Publications. 97.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/law_fac_pub/97
Comments
This document has been made available for download in accordance with the publisher's policy on self-archiving. For more articles from the Marquette Law Review, view its website.
Permission documentation is on file.