Document Type

News Article

Publication Date

3-24-1998

Abstract

In the first study of how juries translate legal language, a University of Dayton law professor has discovered that some juries may creatively interpret the law because judges tend to give little direction. "The typical jury instructions include how to find facts, how to evaluate eyewitness testimony and how to evaluate circumstantial evidence," said Darryl K. Brown, assistant professor of law. "There's little guidance given on how to interpret the law. And while there have been numerous studies about how judges interpret the law, no study has explored how juries do."



Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.