Title
Split Tickets? On the Strategic Allocation of Presidential Versus Vice Presidential Visits in 2016
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-2018
Publication Source
Sage Open
Abstract
This article analyzes the strategic allocation of presidential campaign visits in 2016. In particular, we test whether each campaign disproportionately targeted its presidential versus vice presidential candidates’ visits toward voters with whom they shared a salient demographic or political characteristic. Our purpose in doing so is to discern whether—and, if so, among which groups—the campaigns perceived the candidates as having a strategic advantage in appealing to affiliated voters. To this end, we analyze an original database of 2016 campaign visits that includes local population characteristics for each host site. Our results indicate that each ticket’s visits were highly coordinated across states, but frequently divergent within states. At the substate level, we find several systematic differences in the populations visited by presidential versus vice presidential candidates—in some cases aligning with a candidate’s personal characteristics. We discuss these findings’ implications with respect to campaign strategy and vice presidential selection.
ISBN/ISSN
2158-2440
Document Version
Published Version
Copyright
Copyright © 2018, The Author(s)
Publisher
Sage Publications
Peer Reviewed
yes
Keywords
political science, social science, U.S. presidency, U.S. vice presidency, campaigns and elections, political parties, political behavior, political geography, campaign visits
eCommons Citation
Devine, Christopher J. and Kopko, Kyle C., "Split Tickets? On the Strategic Allocation of Presidential Versus Vice Presidential Visits in 2016" (2018). Political Science Faculty Publications. 115.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/pol_fac_pub/115
Included in
Political Theory Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons
Comments
Document is made available in compliance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (CC-BY).
Permission documentation is on file.