Title
Is Self-Promotion Evaluated More Positively If It Is Accurate? Reexamining the Role of Accuracy and Modesty on the Perception of Self-Promotion
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-25-2018
Publication Source
Self and Identity
Abstract
The present research sought to conceptually replicate and extend previous research showing that accurate self-promotional claims were associated with more favorable interpersonal evaluations than inaccurate claims, but that modest self-claims were evaluated most favorably. Across two experiments we found consistent evidence that a self-promotional claim paired with information that substantiates the claim is associated with more favorable interpersonal evaluations compared to when the claim is unsubstantiated. Despite proposed generational increases in narcissism and public venues for self-promotion, we found that that modest claims are evaluated even more positively than self-promotional claims. The discussion emphasizes the contribution of these findings to an understanding of the consequences of self-promotion.
Document Version
Postprint
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Volume
18
Issue
4
Peer Reviewed
yes
eCommons Citation
O'Mara, Erin M.; Kunz, Benjamin; Receveur, Angela; and Corbin, Sarah, "Is Self-Promotion Evaluated More Positively If It Is Accurate? Reexamining the Role of Accuracy and Modesty on the Perception of Self-Promotion" (2018). Psychology Faculty Publications. 36.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/psy_fac_pub/36
COinS
Comments
The document available for download is the authors' accepted manuscript, provided in compliance with the publisher's policy on self-archiving. For the version of record, use the DOI provided. Permission documentation is on file.