Document Type

Article

Publication Date

7-31-2024

Publication Source

Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

With the HIV/AIDS epidemic gripping the world in the 1990s and the resurgence of the antitrafficking discourse in the 2000s, the sex work/abolitionist debate took center stage. Proponents of sex work uphold the labor and livelihood paradigm based on consent; the abolitionists, on the other hand, dismiss sex work as work to posit prostitution as the paradigmatic example of patriarchal violence toward women. The latter routinely conflate sex work with trafficking, and the former sharply demarcates them. Above all, this debate poses a stubborn ideological divide among feminists with serious policy implications for both the worker and the victim, nationally and globally. Therefore, to imagine a pathway beyond this divide, this review centers on mobility and migration vis-à-vis labor and livelihood. Sex work offers insights into migration broadly speaking because it highlights the intersecting issues of labor, agency, gender, sexual mores, and displacement, all embedded within the global flows of capital.

Inclusive pages

397-414

ISBN/ISSN

1545-4290

Document Version

Published Version

Comments

Link to article on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041422- 024442

Volume

53

Peer Reviewed

yes

Keywords

forced displacement, labor, gender, race, geopolitics, morality


Share

COinS