Euler on Little Fermat and Fermat's Conjecture

Euler on Little Fermat and Fermat's Conjecture

    Presenter(s)

    Chloe M. Crabb

    Comments

    Presentation: 11:40 a.m.-12:00 p.m., Kennedy Union 207

    Description

    For centuries, mathematicians have been exploring the idea of prime numbers. How do we find them? Are there techniques that guarantee the existence of primes? While it is relatively easy to verify the factors of a number today using computers and programs, this was no small task in the in the 18th century or any time before that. Pierre de Fermat was famous for his contributions to number theory but was notorious for leaving the proofs as exercises for others. Two such theorems include “Little Fermat,” which states if p is prime and a is a whole number which does not have p as a factor, then p divides evenly into a^(p+1)-1, and his conjecture that 2^(2^n)+1 is prime. Here we will explore Euler’s proof of “Little Fermat” and run through how he refutes Fermat’s conjecture.

    Publication Date

    4-20-2022

    Project Designation

    Capstone Project

    Primary Advisor

    Rebecca J. Krakowski

    Primary Advisor's Department

    Mathematics

    Keywords

    Stander Symposium project, College of Arts and Sciences

    Euler on Little Fermat and Fermat's Conjecture

    Share

    COinS