•  
  •  
 

Volume 49, Number 0 (2024) Online Supplement to Volume 49

The articles here appear as an online supplement to Volume 49, Issues 1 and 2. They do not appear in the print issues.

Articles

PDF

Rebuttal to Charles J. Russo’s “Point — The Supreme Court Gets It Right in 303 Creative v. Elenis: People of Faith Cannot Be Compelled to Create Expressive Messages Violating Their Religious Beliefs”
Jeffrey C. Sun

PDF

Rebuttal to Jeffrey C. Sun’s "The Privilege to Silence ‘Customized’ Speech: The Website Kerfuffle in 303 Creative v. Elenis”
Charles J. Russo

PDF

Counterpoint to: "The Supreme Court Gets It Right in 303 Creative v. Elenis: People of Faith Cannot Be Compelled to Create Expressive Messages Violating Their Religious Beliefs" — The Privilege to Silence “Customized” Speech: The Website Kerfuffle in 303 Creative v. Elenis
Jeffrey C. Sun

PDF

Point: The Supreme Court Gets It Right in 303 Creative v. Elenis: People of Faith Cannot Be Compelled to Create Expressive Messages Violating Their Religious Beliefs
Charles J. Russo

PDF

Morgan v. Sundance: A Legal Overview of the Prejudice Requirement in Arbitration and Its Impact on Litigation
Sergio Fernandez

Comments

PDF

Creatively Killing the Word “Entirely”: Why the 9th Circuit Got 17 U.S.C. § 114(B) and Music Sampling Law Wrong
Samantha Shemavonian

PDF

Fool’s Gold: An Exploratory Analysis into How Recent Student Successes against the NCAA Poses a Serious Risk to Equity in College Sports
Justin Elkin

PDF

A Global Approach to Evaluating Whether an AI Algorithm Impacting Health Is Unfair to Consumers under the Federal Trade Commission 15 U.S.C. § 45
Sarah Covington

PDF

Third Circuit Buries the Theft-Robbery Distinction in Graves
Richard Smith

PDF

Double Standards or Doubling Down on Mistakes? A Comparative Analysis of the Outcomes and Effects in State of Tennessee v. RaDonda Vaught and Ohio v. Dr. William Husel
Emily Witker