Honors Theses
Advisor
Trip Glazer
Department
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Publication Date
12-2021
Document Type
Honors Thesis
Abstract
The philosopher John Searle wrote that, “The fundamental question in the philosophy of language has always been: How does language relate to reality?” For much of history, people assumed the answer to this question was “the mind”, and the debate was then about how the mind related language to reality. Starting in the 1970s, this view was challenged by the philosopher Hilary Putnam and others who claimed that meaning is not only in the mind but also involved the environment (a view known as semantic externalism). In this paper, I will give some background to Putnam’s semantic externalism and will then defend his view against Searle’s criticism by showing that Searle’s view in fact requires externalism.
Permission Statement
This item is protected by copyright law (Title 17, U.S. Code) and may only be used for noncommercial, educational, and scholarly purposes.
Keywords
Undergraduate research
eCommons Citation
Scheeler, Paul F., "Why Searle's Objection to Twin Earth is Problematic" (2021). Honors Theses. 342.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/uhp_theses/342
COinS
