English Faculty Publications
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2010
Publication Source
Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History
Abstract
The editorial content of piano method books published in the nineteenth century contributed to the gendering of the domestic piano by targeting a middle-class female audience. At the same time, these tutorials circumscribed the ability and ambition of female pianists, cautioning women against technical display or performing challenging pieces in company, thereby reinforcing the stereotype of the graceful, demure woman who played a little. However, this effort was complicated by both the tutorials themselves and contemporary fiction. The middle-class women reading these tutorials also read novels—a fact the method books occasionally acknowledge—which often presented a very different picture of women’s musical abilities. Reading these two genres together offers new ways of understanding both Victorian literature and the cultural contexts in which amateur pianists performed. This essay, therefore, challenges the claims of musicologists who assess amateur women’s musical accomplishments as meager on the basis of prescriptive texts and the claims of literary critics who argue, in the absence of this particular contextual material, for the disciplinary function of fiction and sensation novels in particular.
Inclusive pages
307-32
ISBN/ISSN
0884-2043
Document Version
Postprint
Copyright
Copyright © 2010, CLIO: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History.
Publisher
CLIO
Volume
39
Issue
3
Peer Reviewed
yes
Keywords
piano, women, Victorian era, gender roles
eCommons Citation
Vorachek, Laura, "Reading Music: Representing Female Performance in Nineteenth-century British Piano Method Books and Novels" (2010). English Faculty Publications. 4.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/eng_fac_pub/4
Included in
Gender and Sexuality Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other Music Commons, Reading and Language Commons
Comments
This article is the author's accepted manuscript version. Some differences may exist between the accepted manuscript and the published version; as such, those wishing to quote directly from this source are advised to consult the version of record.
Permission documentation is on file.