Physics Faculty Publications
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2015
Publication Source
Energy Economics
Abstract
To assess the global production costs of shale gas, we combine global top-down data with detailed bottom-up information. Studies solely based on top-down approaches do not adequately account for the heterogeneity of shale gas deposits and hence, are unlikely to appropriately capture the extraction costs of shale gas. We design and provide an expedient bottom-up method based on publicly available US data to compute the levelized costs of shale gas extraction. Our results indicate the existence of economically attractive areas but also reveal a dramatic cost increase as lower-quality reservoirs are exploited. At the global level, our best estimate suggests that, at a cost of 6 US$/GJ, only 39% of the technically recoverable resources reported in top-down studies should be considered economically recoverable. This estimate increases to about 77% when considering an optimistic recovery of resources but could be lower than 12% when considering pessimistic ones. The current lack of information on the heterogeneity of shale gas deposits as well as on the development of future production technologies leads to significant uncertainties regarding recovery rates and production costs. Much of this uncertainty may be inherent, but for energy-system planning purposes, with or without climate change mitigation policies, it is crucial to recognize the full ranges of recoverable quantities and costs.
Inclusive pages
581-587
ISBN/ISSN
0140-9883
Document Version
Preprint
Copyright
Copyright © 2015, Elsevier
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
49
Peer Reviewed
yes
Keywords
Shale gas, Extraction cost curve, Global, ERR
eCommons Citation
Hilaire, Jérôme; Bauer, Nico; and Brecha, Robert J., "Boom or Bust? Mapping Out the Known Unknowns of Global Shale Gas Production Potential" (2015). Physics Faculty Publications. 10.
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/phy_fac_pub/10
Comments
The pre-printed accepted manuscript, available for download after the publisher's required embargo, is licensed under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC-ND user license (attribution, non-commercial use only, no derviatives). Permission documentation is on file.