Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare differences in Nutrition Care Process (NCP) confidence and documentation quality across two different undergraduate student cohorts. This quasi-experimental trial was conducted with n = 29 total undergraduate dietetic students (2023 cohort), then compared with results from the previous years’ (2022) cohort (n = 43). NCP confidence was measured before and after students completed traditional case studies (time 1 and time 2) and after completing an ANDHII case study using an electronic and interactive NCP documentation platform (time 3) for each cohort, then compared between cohorts. Documentation quality was measured using a validated audit tool. In the 2023 cohort, confidence increased from time 1 to time 3 (p = 0.003). Comparison of the 2022 and 2023 cohorts found no significant difference in confidence scores. In the 2023 cohort, documentation quality was higher for the ANDHII (obesity) case study compared to the traditional (anemia) case study.
DOI
10.26890/jujp6390
Recommended Citation
Colin, Casey and Woodcock, Lindsay
(2026)
"Student Exposure to ANDHII Part II: Cross-Cohort Improvements in Confidence Without Parallel Gains in Documentation Quality When Applying the Nutrition Care Process,"
Journal of Dietetic Education: Vol. 4:
Iss.
1, Article 3.
DOI: 10.26890/jujp6390
Available at:
https://ecommons.udayton.edu/jde/vol4/iss1/3
Included in
Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Commons, Higher Education Commons, Other Nutrition Commons